GAO
Releases Report Suggesting that Testing Costs May Fall to StatesOn May
8, 2003, the United States General
Accounting Office (GAO) released a report
estimating that the states would need to spend between $1.9 and $5.3 billion over
the next six years to comply with testing requirements contained in the No Child
Left Behind Act (NCLB). These estimates do not include the (for some states potentially
considerable) costs of developing English language proficiency testing and alternate
assessments for students with disabilities. They also do not include any estimate
of expenditures local school districts may incur with respect to the assessments.
When NCLB was passed, Congress committed to providing a total of $2.34 billion
through FY 2007 to help states meet these costs. The law currently requires
that students take state assessments in math and reading at least once in elementary
school, middle school, and high school. Beginning in 2005-06, students must be
tested in math and reading every year in grades 3-8. Science assessments must
be developed and put into place by the 2007-08 school year. Because state assessments
must be aligned with state standards, states must either develop customized tests
or augment commercially available tests. (ACCESS's policy
brief on NCLB explains in more detail the law's testing requirements and the
considerable consequences for schools or districts that fail to make adequate
yearly progress on the assessments.) The report provides three estimates
of total expenditures between fiscal year 2002 and 2008, based on different assumptions
about the types of test questions states may choose to implement. If states use
tests that ask students only to answer multiple-choice questions, and thus can
be entirely computer-scored, GAO estimates total expenditures will be about $1.9
billion. If states keep their current mix of multiple-choice and open-ended questions,
GAO estimates total cost will be about $3.9 billion. If all states move to a mix
of multiple-choice and open-ended questions, GAO estimates the total cost will
be $5.3 billion. Other factors that will affect states' costs include how many
new tests they must develop to meet the mandates, whether the tests are entirely
customized, how many of the questions on their tests they release to the public
(and thus cannot reuse), how many versions of the tests they give in a given year,
and how quickly they need to grade the tests. The GAO estimates are based on a
survey sent to all 50 states as well as the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico
and detailed analysis of actual expenditures by seven states (Colorado, Delaware,
Maine, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Texas and Virginia) that already have extensive
testing in place. In addition to aggregate numbers, the report provided estimated
costs and projected appropriations for each of the fifty states, D.C., and Puerto
Rico. The report further illustrates what state leaders have contended often
over the past year: The federal government has not provided sufficient funding
to meet NCLB mandates. GAO suggests that the Department of Education should help
facilitate information sharing among states on strategies to reduce costs associated
with the tests. Of course, the easiest way to reduce costs is to move exclusively
or largely to multiple choice questions. Many educators feel, however, that open-ended
questions, requiring both short and long students responses, more effectively
measure certain skills such as writing, math computation, or analytic argument.
Given the extent of "teaching to the test" already experienced in classrooms
across the country, a shift to exclusively multiple choice tests might be expected
to weaken the emphasis on certain essential skills that cannot be captured in
multiple choice questions. A bi-partisan response to NCLB is developing
in many states. In addition to helping the states further with the costs associated
with developing and scoring high-quality assessments, these people want Congress
to provide substantial increases in Title I funding. Prepared May 13,
2003 |