School Funding Cases in 25 States: Rulings in Nebraska
and Wyoming, Trials Approaching in Iowa and Texas, Other
News
With three major court rulings earlier this year, the
summer expected to see the South Carolina trial end
and another trial begin, and many other school funding
cases moving forward, plaintiffs are increasing the
pressure on state legislatures to provide adequate funding
and the educational opportunities their state constitutions
require.
Arkansas Oral Argument
On May 20, 2004, the Arkansas Supreme Court heard oral
arguments on whether the Legislature’s actions earlier
this year have complied with the court’s November
2002 order, which had declared the education finance
system inadequate, inequitable and unconstitutional.
Attorneys representing the governor and a number of
school districts urged the court to stay involved, while
the attorney for the legislature said the court should
exit the case. This April 2nd, the court received a
lengthy report on the State’s enacted reforms from
two
special masters it had appointed. A special legislative
session on education is scheduled to resume June 9th.
Nebraska and Wyoming
Rulings
On May 17, the Nebraska trial court in the Douglas
County v. Johanns school funding case denied
state defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on five of seven
claims. While upholding plaintiffs’ two equal protection
claims, two “special legislation” claims, and single
due process claim, the court joined a small minority
courts in other states that have found certain school
funding claims non-justiciable. The court granted the
state’s Motion to Dismiss regarding plaintiffs’ two
claims that the school funding system violates Nebraska’s
constitutional provision requiring the legislature to
provide free instruction in the common schools.
Nebraska procedural law does not allow an appeal on
the denial of the state’s motion on the five remaining
claims, and plaintiffs have not yet announced whether
they will seek an appeal on the two dismissed claims.
Another pending matter may also affect the proceedings,
as rural Nebraska plaintiffs are expected to file their
own school funding suit or intervene in the Douglas
County case later this year.
In Wyoming’s Campbell
v. State education finance case, on May 10,
the Wyoming Supreme Court denied the state’s Petition
for Resolution of Constitutional Interpretation Questions,
which plaintiffs had opposed. The Petition focused only
on capital construction funding. By contrast, plaintiffs
have indicated that they plan to return to court with
much broader challenges to the state’s compliance with
the court’s orders in Campbell.
Massachusetts and Montana Updates
Following April rulings by lower courts in favor of
plaintiffs in both states, the Massachusetts Supreme
Judicial Court has established a briefing schedule and
will hear oral arguments in October, in Hancock
v. Driscoll, with a decision anticipated in
December 2004, and the State of Montana is considering,
but has not yet decided, whether to appeal the Columbia
Falls v. State decision. Their deadline for
filing a notice of appeal is June 18.
Texas and Iowa Trials
In Texas, the trial in West
Orange-Cove Consolidated ISD v. Nelson is scheduled
to start on August 9th. A Texas Supreme Court decision
last
May remanded the case for trial, and the legislature
and governor failed to revise the school funding system
in the 2004 regular session and a special
session that ended May 19.
The Iowa trial in Coalition
for a Common Cents Solution v. State is scheduled
to begin November 1, 2004. Plaintiffs seek, inter
alia, a declaration that education is a fundamental
right in Iowa.
Many Other States Proceeding with School Funding
Litigations
Many school funding cases are in various stages of
liability, remedial or compliance proceedings. For example,
in Kentucky’s Young
v. Williams case the trial court recently granted
plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint to add count
based on the legislature’s failure to enact a budget
in their 2004 session. And, among other developments,
settlement talks are ongoing in California’s Williams
v. State case and Alaska’s Kasayulie
v. State case, discovery in preparation for
trial is progressing in Missouri’s Committee
for Educational Equality v. State case, and
appeals are in process in Arizona
and Idaho.
Also, the list of cases may grow longer later this
year, as potential plaintiffs in Georgia, Michigan,
and Oklahoma are preparing potential suits.
Prepared by Molly A. Hunter, May 27, 2004
|