South Dakota Schools, Students, and Parents Seek
“Adequate and Quality Education” in State
Court Action
On June 22, 2006, a coalition of 59 South Dakota school
districts, and students and parents in those districts,
filed a lawsuit against the state, claiming that the
state's education finance system fails to provide sufficient
resources for the state’s students to obtain “an
education that will equip them to function in society
as responsible citizens who can find productive employment,”
as required by the South Dakota Constitution. In response,
some state legislators agreed that a funding increase
is needed, but regretted the filing of the suit, the
Argus Leader reported. The Governor and Secretary
of Education had no immediate comment.
Plaintiffs’ Complaint
Relying on language in their state constitution and
a history behind that language that acknowledged the
importance of public education to the preservation of
democracy, plaintiffs claim that “the right to
a free, adequate and quality public education is a fundamental
right under the South Dakota Constitution.” Plaintiffs
also contend that the school funding system bears “no
relationship to the actual costs of providing an adequate
education” or to the state’s own “academic
achievement and performance standards” and that
it must do so in order to be constitutionally sound.
A cost study is attached to the complaint, filed in
the Hughes County Circuit Court.
Drawing contrasts with the state’s earlier history
of support for public education, the complaint recounts
“draconian” cuts in recent years that have
caused increased class sizes, classes combined across
grades, and school closings. Moreover, plaintiffs allege
that under-funding has “wreaked havoc” on
the capacity of schools to provide South Dakota children
“an adequate and quality education.”
Relief Sought
The Complaint
in South Dakota Schools Coalition v. State,
seeks a declaratory judgment from the court and “enforcement
of [plaintiffs’] constitutional rights.”
Plaintiffs ask the court to declare education a fundamental
right in South Dakota and declare that:
- the constitution guarantees a free, adequate and
quality public education
- the constitutional standard for an adequate and
quality education is to prepare student to meet state
standards, become capable civic participants and employees,
and qualify for higher education
- funding must be based on actual costs, and
- the current finance system violates plaintiffs’
constitutional rights.
Plaintiffs are represented by Scott Abdallah, of Johnson,
Heidepriem. Defendants are expected to be represented
by the State Attorney General.
Prepared by Molly A. Hunter, June 26, 2006 |