Home















ACCESS
Court Decisions | Litigation News | Policy News | Advocacy News | NCLB News | Archive  

Maryland Court Orders Better Funding for City Schools, State Will Appeal

On August 20, 2004, Judge Joseph Kaplan of Baltimore City Circuit Court held that the education being provided to the children of Baltimore continues to violate the "thorough and efficient" education provision of the Maryland Constitution. Plaintiffs in the school funding adequacy case, Bradford v. Maryland State Board of Education, returned to court recently due to funding and program cuts instituted after mismanagement had created a $58 million deficit in the Baltimore City school district.

Management has been replaced. But, under a state law that required the district to pay down the deficit over two years, summer school was eliminated this year, class sizes grew, and the number of experienced teachers, mentors, and guidance counselors was reduced, which the court found "impermissibly interfered with progress towards providing a constitutionally adequate education for Baltimore schoolchildren."

Judge Kaplan declared the two-year payback law unconstitutional and ordered restoration of the $30-$45 million that was stripped from the 2004-05 school budget (for the deficit) and reinstatement of reduced programs and services.

"Judge Kaplan has been clear – the children must come first," said Bebe Verdery, director of the ACLU of Maryland Education Reform Project. The ACLU of Maryland represents the plaintiffs.

As reported in the Baltimore Sun on August 26, the State Board of Education voted to appeal the decision.

In 2002, after a new funding system was enacted with plans for funding increases to be phased in over six years, the Bradford court retained jurisdiction, pending actual implementation. Thus, when significant funding shifted this year to deficit payback, plaintiffs were able to return to court without the delay and expense of filing a new case. In his decision, Judge Kaplan also criticized the planned phase-in because it front-loaded funding increases to wealthier counties and should have directed more funding sooner to the benefit of the at-risk students in Baltimore City.


Prepared by Molly A. Hunter, August 30, 2004