Idaho Supreme Court Thwarts Legislature's Attempt
to End School Funding Suit
In a decision issued August 25, 2004, the Idaho Supreme
Court declared a law enacted to end Idaho's school funding
lawsuit -- Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity
(ISEEO) v. State -- unconstitutional, affirming
a state district court decision.
The law, HB 403, required parents seeking safe school
buildings to sue their local school district instead
of the State, authorized the legislature to sue the
ISEEO plaintiff school districts, and required Idaho
Courts to order property tax increases in poor school
districts if unsafe building conditions were found.
The supreme court held that HB 403 was a "special
law" designed only to affect one particular lawsuit,
in violation of the state constitution, and that it
attempted
to end legislatively the ISEEO suit and effectively
remove itself from any further responsibility or liability.
Such a law is arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable.
Moreover, the court found that HB 403 violated the
fundamental principles of the separation of powers doctrine
by assigning the power to tax to the judiciary, again
violating the state constitution.
In 2001, after years of litigation over dilapidated
and unsafe school buildings, the district court held
that the state system for financing school facilities
was unconstitutional, specifically because it relies
exclusively on local property taxes for school construction
and renovation even though many districts lack adequate
funding capacity. In 2002, the court appointed a special
master to assess run-down school buildings across the
state. Instead of enacting a remedy to the ISEEO case,
the legislature enacted HB 403 in 2003.
Next, the case will proceed on the state's challenge
to the district court's appointment of a special master.
Prepared by Molly A. Hunter, August 30, 2004
|