Arkansas Fact Sheet
Background
State Funding Context
From NCES (most current available statistics):
Pre-K to 12 Students, 2004-05: 463,115
Annual Public School Expenditures, 2003-04:
$3.11 billion
% Eligible for Free/Reduced Lunch, 2004-05:
51.9
% in limited-English-proficiency programs,
2004-05: 4.0
Note: This study is an
update of the 2003
Arkansas Adequacy Study
| Study Title: |
"Recalibrating
the Arkansas School Funding Structure"
|
| Date Completed: |
August 2006
|
| Definition of Adequacy: |
The study states as its goal the
development of a funding system that
will meet Arkansas’ constitutional
requirement of “a general, suitable
and efficient system of free schools.”
The authors of the study also indicate
that the study is meant to help “dramatically
improve student performance results
– which we summarize by saying
doubling performance.”
|
| Calculated Per Pupil
Costs: |
Base per pupil cost:
$5,864 (up from approx. $5,400
in the 2003 report)
Additional weightings:
- “At-risk” students
(qualify for free or reduced-price
lunches): An additional amount that
increases with the concentration
of at-risk students in a school,
starting with an estimated $542
per pupil for concentrations less
than 70% (up from $480 in the 2003
report)
- ELL students: $542 per student
(up from approx. $200 in the 2003
report)
- Special education: Varies; approximately
an additional $6,774 per student
Additional required costs
not included in the “base”
cost:
- $50 per pupil for expanded professional
development
- $286 per pupil for transportation
|
| Calculated Additional
Costs: |
As the study was intended to help
recalibrate the Arkansas school funding
formula and not to determine the full
cost of adequacy, the study does not
provide a total expected cost.
For the basic per pupil amount alone,
the study estimates an additional
cost of $220 million (approximately
7% of 2003-04 expenditures).
|
| Major Recommendations: |
The study starts with broad recommendations
for what the study is costing out,
including:
- Directing most additional resources
to direct services for students,
particularly for students from low-income
backgrounds;
- Small class sizes in the early
elementary years, with class sizes
of 25 for grades 4-12 (larger than
recommended in most professional
judgment studies);
- Preschool for all low-income
students (the study does not cost-out
preschool and states that Arkansas
has “one of the highest quality
programs in the nation” and
encourages the state to continue
fully funding such programs);
- Increased and ongoing professional
development for teachers;
- Extended day, summer school,
and tutoring programs, particularly
for low-income students;
- Rigorous and improved curricula;
<
The study recommends updating the
Arkansas school funding formula to
account for the evidence-based proposals
recommended, including:
- The costs recommended in the
“per pupil costs” section,
in particular increasing the number
of teachers for ELL and at-risk
students;
- Tutoring for at-risk students;
- Implementing full-day kindergarten;
- Meeting the teacher-student and
staff-student ratios recommended
in the study;
- Improving teacher professional
development
- Updating classroom technology;
- Providing adequate levels of
classroom supplies;
- Meeting the needs of school district
central offices.
The study recommends changing the
special education funding formula
by basing it on a Full-Time Equivalency
count of special education students
rather than the current headcount
method.
Transportation costs should be provided
to districts as a separate grant,
providing each district with the amount
actually spent per pupil on transportation.
The state should create a research-based
transportation funding formula.
A full list of the recommended resource
levels is found in section 5 of the
study (pp. 73-80)
|
| Methodology: |
Evidence-based
Approach:
The study updates the 2003
adequacy study in Arkansas by using
a similar “effective strategies”
evidence-based approach that utilizes
what the study’s authors describe
as educational strategies that research
literature shows has been effective
in improving student achievement.
|
| Special Features: |
- This study did not consider capital
funding for facilities or funding
for food service or adult education,
which are ordinarily excluded from
adequacy studies.
- While the study discusses preschool,
it does not attempt to cost it out.
- The study did include transportation
costs, but notes that the amount
will vary from district to district
and that the legislature should
develop a research-based transportation
funding formula.
|
| Public Input: |
None.
|
| Implementation: |
In March 2007, the Arkansas legislature
passed HB 1632 and HB 1633. These
bills together will increase per pupil
funding to $5,876 over two years.
This would cause an increase in school
spending of $121.7 million over two
years. Gov. Mike Beebe signed the
bills on March 14.
The new per pupil target in these
bills is just over the $5,864 "base"
cost recommended in this study. Based
on the study, the state would have
to increase funding in order to fully
meet the needs of all of the state's
students.
|
| Prepared for: |
Adequacy Study Oversight Sub-Committee
of the House and Senate Interim Committees
on Education, of the Arkansas General
Assembly
|
| Prepared by: |
Lawrence O. Picus & Associates |
Fact Sheet prepared by Matthew Samberg,
April, 2006.
|