Home















ACCESS
Court Decisions | Litigation News | Policy News | Advocacy News | NCLB News | Archive  

California School Funding System Inequitable, Inadequate and Incomprehensible

According to a year-long series of articles, "Paying for Schools," in The Sacramento Bee newspaper, the State of California's system for funding its nearly 1,000 school districts -- which educates over 6 million students -- is a morass of over 100 complicated funding streams that confuse even funding experts and, ultimately, deliver insufficient resources to many schools while providing irrational funding perks to some.

Annual state K-12 funding in California consists of "basic" allocations of $29 billion, "categorical" funding of almost $12 billion -- distributed according to about 100 formulas -- and "state mandate" funding of $200 million, according to the series. This large funding system, however, is not based on the actual costs of providing an educational opportunity to students and has not been linked to the state's student learning standards.

Instead, The Bee found, the number of funding streams has grown over many years and some are based on local circumstances or decisions made in the1970s or 1980s that are no longer relevant for education funding. More importantly, the system results in large disparities and leaves many schools with inadequate funding. The Bee provides some specific examples and their origins in certain inequitable state funding provisions.

Quality Education Commission

Despite continuing revenue shortfalls, the future holds potential good news for California school funding because the State has established the California Quality Education Commission to develop a Quality Education Model (QEM) for pre-K through grade 12. The Commission, final members of which are now being appointed by the new governor, is charged with determining the "educational components, educational resources, and corresponding costs" necessary "so that the vast majority of pupils can meet [state] academic performance standards." The Commission is expected to include parents, educators, and the public in the design of the QEM, and issue a report in about 12 months. The Commission is modeled after a Quality Education Commission that designed Oregon's Quality Education Model.

Williams v. State

Also on the horizon of school funding in California is the Williams v. State lawsuit, scheduled to go to trial in 2004. The Williams plaintiffs are asking the State Superior Court to require the state to ensure that certain educational basics, such as qualified teachers, safe facilities, and textbooks, are provided in all schools.

 

Prepared by Molly A. Hunter, December 12, 2003