“School Finance in Mississippi
: A Proposal for an Alternate System”
Date
Completed:
December 1993
Calculated
Base Costs:
Overall, the average per-pupil foundation
amount for 1992-93 would have been $2,754, ranging
from $2,746 to $3,256 per pupil. This does not
include federal funds.
In a hypothetical school district with an
enrollment of 2,500 (two elementary schools,
a middle school, and a high school), the base
cost was $2,006 per pupil for school year 1993-94.
In an examination of 24 “typical” existing districts,
the base cost was $2,147 per pupil for school
year 1992-93.
Adjustments
included $107.35 per pupil for low-income students,
$119.2 million statewide for special education,
$71.4 million for vocational education, and $67
million for transportation.
Major
Recommendations:
Eliminate the inadequate and inequitable
Minimum Education Program (Mississippi's school
finance system since 1953) and adopt a multi-tiered
funding program.
First tier: A per-pupil foundation consisting
of the base cost plus adjustments for low-income
students, special education, vocational education,
and transportation. This tier would be primarily
financed by the state, but supplemented by local
property tax revenues.
Second
tier: A “reward-for-effort” plan in
which state compensation ensures that two
districts making the same tax effort generate
the same per-pupil revenue, up to a designated
amount.
Third
tier: Revenue raised locally beyond the first
two tiers.
Increase
average per-pupil spending, including third-tier
local contributions, to $3,092 (a $276 raise).
Increase
state aid to schools from $900 million in 1991-2
to about $1.05 billion.
No
district should receive less than a five percent
increase in state aid.
The
base cost should be reexamined every 4-5 years,
and should be adjusted for inflation each year
in the interim.
The
state should consider providing additional funding
to stimulate innovation or reward high-performing
districts.
Special
Features of the Study:
It
appears that the authors collaborated closely
with the Task Force and members of the Department
of Education to create a politically viable proposal.
Determined
the per-pupil base cost by considering only demographically
average districts.
Funding
is based on average daily attendance, not total
enrollment.
Authors
say the proposal would result in a more equitable
distribution of per pupil revenues statewide.
Implementation:
The Mississippi Adequate Education Plan (MAEP)
was passed by the legislature in 1994 and funded
in 1997. MAEP is a foundation program very similar
to the one proposed by this report. The required
local contribution is capped at 27% of program
cost. In FY 1998, the total cost of MAEP was
about $1.25 billion, with the state share being
81% and the local share being 19%.
The state authorized the Task Force on Restructuring
the Minimum Education Program to contract for
research and consulting services with school
finance experts to recommend a restructuring
of Mississippi 's school funding system.
Researchers
created a hypothetical district based on a set
of costs suggested by the Mississippi Department
of Education.
The
team identified 24 “typical” districts
using markers including school size, the assessed
valuation per pupil, the percentage of students
receiving free lunch, the operating tax levy,
and other local revenues. They also analyzed
district expenditures in four major “cost centers”:
instruction, administration, plant operation
and maintenance, and ancillary support. In calculating
the average expenditures in each cost center,
outlier districts were not considered, nor were
districts that failed to meet state accreditation
standards.
The team recommended multiplying the number
of free-lunch-eligible students in each district
by an extremely low 1.05 when determining average
daily attendance.
Because the team lacked the resources to create
new formulas for special education, vocational
education, and transportation expenditures, they
recommended that these adjustments be based on
existing state formulas.
Public
Input:
None
Additional
Factors:
The study does not take into account personnel
benefits, such as health and retirement, or capital
outlay and debt service.
Prepared
by:
The Task Force on Restructuring the Minimum
Education Program
Prepared
for:
Augenblick, Van de Waters & Myers
National Access
Network, Teachers College, Columbia University. Copyright 2001-2008.