Home

















Costing-Out Home | Overview | A Primer | State Fact Sheets | Policy Brief  

Montana Fact Sheet

Background

Related News

State Funding Context

From www.edweek.org (most current available statistics):

Pre-K-12 Enrollment: 149,995
Students Eligible for Free/Reduced Price Lunch: 31.9%
English-Language Learners: 4.4%
Annual Pre-K-12 Expenditures: $1.1 billion

Study Title: "Calculation of the Cost of a Suitable Education in Montana in 2001-2002 Using the Professional Judgment Approach"
Date Completed:

August 2002

Calculated Base Costs:

Costs in each of five prototype districts, without factoring in student needs:

small K-12: $8,041 per pupil
moderate K-12: $6,751 per pupil
large K-12 district: $6,004 per pupil
very large K-12 district: $6,048
elementary district: $6,885 per pupil

After factoring in costs for sepcial education, Native American, and poor students, the average total expenditures for each of the five prototype districts were:

small K-12: $9,954 per pupil
moderate K-12: $8,992 per pupil
large K-12: $7,694 per pupil
very large K-12: $7,681 per pupil
elementary district: $8,720 per pupil

Average total expenditure per pupil in 2001-02 was $7,007.

The Montana School Boards Association applied these base cost figures to the state’s school districts to determine the total increase required: $171 million, or 17 percent, over the base of $996 million spent by Montana schools in the 2000-2001 school year.

Major Recommendations:

Set foundation funding amounts based on the services delivered, including an evaluation of student needs, and based on the level of performance students are expected to achieve.

Expected student performance was between 84 and 89 percent of students scoring at the proficient level or higher in five subjects in fourth, eighth, and eleventh grade after five years.

Adjust this amount for geographic cost differences.

Professional development needs to be consistent across all districts.

Include full-day kindergarten and gifted and talented programs for all students and add pre-school, summer school, and extended day programs for at-risk students.

Special Features of the Study: The study revealed that school districts were taking on a large burden in developing content standards and assessment tools because the Montana Office of Public Instruction did not have sufficient capacity to do this work. The resources identified for the prototype school districts did not fully cover this additional role in the state’s standards-based reform efforts.
Implementation: None.
Methodology:

Professional Judgment Method

Five panels of Montana educators estimated the resources needed at prototype school sites at the elementary, middle, and high school levels. Five district panels reviewed the work of the five schools panels and added resources needed at the district level. Finally, one “expert” panel reviewed the work of all of the district panels and made choices regarding the price of resources.

Prepared for: Montana School Boards Association, Montana Quality Education Coalition, Montana Rural Education Association, Montana Association of School Business Officials, and Montana Association of County School Superintendents
Prepared by: Augenblick & Myers, Inc.