New York Fact Sheet
Background
| Study Title: |
"New
York Adequacy Study: Providing all children
with full opportunity to meet the Regents
Learning Standards" |
| |
|
| Date Completed: |
March 2004 |
| |
|
| Calculated Base Costs: |
Between $6.2 billion and $8.4 billion additional
funding in 2001-02 dollarsan increase
of 19.6% to 26.5% (on a base of $31.71 billion
actually spent that year). |
| |
About 62% of the increase is needed in the
1.1 million-student New York City district. |
| |
This study systematically analyzed specific
additional need related to actual concentrations
of low-income, special education, and ELL
students, rather than develop additional
weighting factors, as many studies have.
|
| |
|
| Major Recommendations: |
Align funding with student need.
Adopt a foundation-based approach.
Pre-kindergarten education programs as well
as extended day and summer school programs
are critical to the educational success
of children living in poverty.
Allocate spending increase to 517 districts
(162 other districts in the state were found
to be spending adequately).
Adjust resources for geographic cost differences.
Adjust resources for geographic cost differences.
|
| |
|
| Special Features of the Study: |
Use of public engagement - see Public
Input, below - and a stakeholder panel,
the Council for Costing Out, comprised of
organizations representing parents, taxpayers,
the business community, school board members
and other education interest groups.
Relied on the New
York State Regents Learning Standards
(RLS) as the student performance criteria
because they were designed to prepare students
for citizenship and employment in the 21st
century.
Set the school funding goal at 100% of students
receiving the "full opportunity"
to meet the Regents Learning Standards (RLS)
and, thereby, having the opportunity to
earn a high school diploma.
To supplement the Professional Judgment
approach, the researchers:
analyzed costs and staffing in successful
New York schools
created a Geographic Cost of Education
Index for regions throughout the state
by analyzing teacher labor markets, and
had outside consultants conduct an independent
review of the study.
Attempted to make transparent all of the
important assumptions in the study.
|
| |
|
| Implementation: |
Not yet implemented |
| |
|
| Methodology: |
Professional
Judgement |
| |
Definition: Sound Basic Education
Adequate funding was defined as the funding
levels needed to ensure that all schools
provide the opportunity to obtain a sound
basic education (the state constitutional
requirement) to all of their students.
|
| |
PJP's
|
| |
Professional Judgment Panels (PJPs) designed
instructional programs for schools at the
elementary, middle and high school levels.
Eight panels comprised of seven New York
educators each, included 2 panels each from:
New York City school district
High-need urban districts
Average- and low-need districts, and
Small town and rural districts.
After developing the instructional programs,
each panel specified the resources needed
to provide the programs, e.g. teachers.
Then, each panel varied the instructional
programs for schools with different percentages
of low-income and ELL students.
Two additional panels with members from
the initial 8 panels convened to review/adjust
services tentatively allocated for special
education students by the initial 8 panels,
which had concluded that most special education
students could be educated in general education
classrooms.
|
| |
Researchers |
| |
The researchers calculated the costs of
the resources specified by the PJPs and
adjusted them according to a geographic
cost index that they developed.
The Geographic Cost of Education Index
specified a range from 0.8 to 1.10, compared
to the SED's Regional Cost Index range
from 1.0 to 1.496.
Later in the process, one "Summary
PJP Team" with members selected from
the initial 8 panels convened twice to help
synthesize, clarify and interpret the study's
results.
|
| |
|
| Additional Factors: |
The "New York Adequacy
Study" was undertaken at the behest of
the Campaign
for Fiscal Equity and the New
York State School Boards Association,
in partnership with 28 other organizations
statewide, so that the state could be prepared
to move forward on a remedy in the lawsuit
challenging the state's funding system as
unconstitutional (CFE
v. State). It was paid for by foundation
grants, performed by A.I.R. and MAP, and released
March 30, 2004. |
| |
|
| Public Input:
|
The initial stage of the study was devoted
to 13 public engagement meetings held across
the state in which participants were asked
what criteria define an "adequate"
educational opportunity and
what do public schools in New York need
in order to ensure all their students
that opportunity?
These meetings established the outcome
standards for the study, that is, meeting
the RLS and 100% of students having the
"full opportunity" to reach this
level of achievement. Participants also
recommended many programs and interventions
(such as preschool, early literacy, small
classes, guidance, and professional development)
considered critical to providing a genuine
opportunity, especially for at-risk students.
For more detail on this public engagement,
see: Adequate
Funding for New York's Schools: Communities
Speak Out on What Schools Really Need to
Succeed, (2003).
For information on the only other state
to undertake a public engagement process
in connection with its education cost study,
see the Maine
Fact Sheet.
|
| |
|
| Prepared for: |
The Atlantic Philanthropies,
The Ford Foundation, and The Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation |
| |
|
| Prepared by: |
American Institutes
for Research (A.I.R.) and Management
Analysis and Planning, Inc. (MAP) |
|
We also provide summaries of the findings, methodologies
used, and key recommendations of the "Resource
Adequacy Study" and Regents "Foundation
Aid Proposal."
Prepared by Molly A. Hunter, April 28, 2004
|