Ohio Fact Sheet (2003)
Background
Related
News
This study, estimating the cost of bringing Ohio into
compliance with the federal "No Child Left Behind
Act" ("NCLB"), was the first of its kind.
It was prepared within a limited 90-day timeframe, and
the experts acknowledge that additional time would have
enabled further collaboration with school districts
to explore compliance costs. Nevertheless, it offers
a meaningful starting point for further development
and methodological improvements in future NCLB cost
studies.
| Study Title: |
"Projected
Costs of Implementing the Federal 'No
Child Left Behind Act' In Ohio" |
| Date Completed: |
December 2003 |
| Highlights of the Study: |
|
| Calculated Marginal Costs: |
Marginal
cost of NCLB: $1.447 billion per year (in 2004
dollars), an 11 percent increase from Ohio's current
$13.322 billion annual educational expenditures
Anticipated
NCLB federal funds to cover these costs: $44 million
for 2004
Administrative,
Teacher, and Paraprofessional cost: $105 million
(in 2004 dollars), 7 percent of total cost, including:
New math and reading proficiency tests in four
grades that Ohio did not administer before.
The study estimated the initial cost for developing
all of the new tests to be $9.1 million and
the annual cost for administering all the tests
to be $25.6 million per year.
Student
intervention costs: $1.386 billion (in 2004 dollars),
93 percent of the total cost.
The study was based on the assumption that intervention
in the first four grades would be the most cost-effective
way to raise pupil performance. Intervention
cost for K-3 is $923.7 million per year and
for grades 4-12 is $462.0 million.
Intervention
services include: summer school, extended school
day, intensive in-school intervention, academic
coordination services (meaning, one-on-one supervision
of pupil's progress), and early and on-going
student assessment.
|
| Major Recommendations: |
The
selected intervention programs are not intended
to be a ready-to-implement array of programs, rather
they constitute a model for estimating costs.
The
study suggests that the performance tests should
be regularly updated, but the cost of updating the
tests was not estimated.
Although
the study does not consider the cost of preschool
programs, the experts acknowledge that effective
intervention in early childhood education "can
be expected to reduce the intervention cost estimates
calculated in this study."
|
| Special Features of the Study: |
A
report issued in January 2004, by the Ohio Department
of Education, included ten outside expert critiques
of this study. Two experts believe the analysis
and costs are basically accurate, two believe
that the study substantially underestimates the
cost, three believe that the study substantially
overestimates the cost, and three believe that
the "assumptions and degree of speculation"
the study is based upon substantially undermines
the accuracy of the costs.
Eight
of the outside experts express concern that the
intervention costs are not based on research-based
evidence.
The
study did not consider efficiencies in the current
use of existing funds. For example, three of the
outside experts suggest that redeployment of existing
professional development revenue would achieve
the NCLB high quality professional development
requirement. Also, four of the outside experts
believe that funding preschool education programs
would decrease the cost of bringing pupils to
proficiency during later schooling.
The
study assumed that current local, state, and federal
funding will continue to support existing initiatives.
Implementation: None
|
| Methodology: |
This study estimated the marginal costs needed
in addition to the pre-existing system to comply
with the NCLB, which sets the goal of reaching 100
percent proficiency on achievement tests by the
2013-2014 school year. First, the study categorized
the costs associated with the NCLB requirement into
two distinct groups: (1) administrative, teacher,
and paraprofessional costs and (2) student intervention
costs.
The first group included the cost of developing
and administering new performance tests, ensuring
"highly qualified" teachers and paraprofessionals,
offering "highly effective" professional
development activities, and administrating the
NCLB parent notification requirement of teacher
qualifications.
In calculating student intervention costs, the
experts examined what expenditures were necessary
to "bridge the gap" between Ohio's 75
percent passage rate standard, and the NCLB 100
percent passage rate standard. To do this, the
study used actual pupil performance data to determine
how many pupils failed to meet the 100% proficiency
standard, how far away they were from meeting
the standard, and the characteristics of the low-performing
pupils. This analysis was then applied to the
current K-3 pupil population to separate the pupils
into three groups by performance level.
The costs for different intervention strategies
needed to bring each group to proficiency were
then estimated. For example, the cost per pupil
for summer school was calculated by adding together
the cost of the following components: administrative
costs (including principal, secretary, and custodial/security
costs), transportation costs, and classroom costs
(including teacher, instructional assistant, and
teacher training costs).
After the full cost of compliance with the NCLB
was assessed, it was offset by the overlapping
existing expenditures and by additional NCLB funding
anticipated from the federal government.
The study used performance data provided by the
Ohio Department of Education. The study also considered
suggestions and criticisms provided by the Ohio
Department of Education, the staff of Columbus
City School District and the Ohio Association
of School Business Officials.
|
| Public Input: |
None |
| Prepared for: |
Ohio
Department of Education, pursuant to House Bill
3 (effective August 2003) Ohio General Assembly |
| Prepared by: |
William Driscoll and Dr. Howard Fleeter |
|