Home

















Costing-Out Home | Overview | A Primer | State Fact Sheets | Policy Brief  

Ohio Fact Sheet (1997)

Background

Study Title: "Recommendations for a Base Figure and Pupil-Weighted Adjustments to the Base Figure for Use in a New School Finance System in Ohio"
Date Completed: July 1997
Highlights of the Study:  
Calculated Base Costs: Basic Foundation Amount: $3,930 per pupil (in 1996 dollars)
Pupil weights were used to reflect supplemental costs. Pupils in special education programs were placed into 3 groups by disability. The following are the excess cost weights for each group: 21.01 for Group 1, 2.86 for Group 2, and .21 for Group 3.
Due to the federal funding scheme that provides aid for at-risk pupils, school districts incur higher costs when the concentration of at-risk pupils exceeds 35 percent and when the concentration is less than 17 percent. This study uses a formula that provides aid right in the middle. It calculates the cost of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) pupils as follows: Aid per TANF pupil = (25% * Base Figure) * (1 + TANF/total Average Daily Membership).
Major Recommendations: In the future, it may be a more accurate reflection of actual costs to classify pupils in special education programs by treatment approach rather than by disability.
The base figure should be increased by 2.8 percent each year for inflation.
The foundation level should be reexamined every 3-5 years to ensure that it reflects expenditures associated with the resources school districts actually need to meet state performance objectives.
Special Features of the Study:

The base figure using the approach developed by the panel of experts (including this study's expert) in a1995 court-ordered study would have been $4,649 per pupil (in 1996 dollars). The expert performing this study modified the methodology by eliminating all input criteria (such as teacher's beginning salary and pupil-teacher ratio) and by removing outlier districts according to per pupil property wealth or median income per return rather than per pupil basic spending.


Implementation:

The legislature enacted House Bill 650, revising most factors in the funding system. The legislature adjusted the study's recommended per-pupil amount of $4,269 (in 1999 dollars, adjusting for inflation) to $4,063, $370 million less per year in state foundation aid.
The increase in funding was to be phased in, beginning with a foundation amount of $3,851 in 1999, and reaching the projected inflation-adjusted equivalent of $4,063 in 2002.
Instead of raising taxes themselves to pay for House Bill 650, the legislators placed Issue 2 on the May 1998 primary ballot, which asked voters to approve a 1 percent sales tax increase, projected to generate $1.1 billion a year. Legislators and the governor said that the new revenues would fund $550 million in residential property tax rebates and a $550 million increase in school funding. Voters were skeptical and overwhelmingly rejected Issue 2.
Circuit Court Judge Linton Lewis criticized both the study and House Bill 650 in 1999. In DeRolph II, the Ohio Supreme Court also found fault with the legislature for enlisting this expert and then unexplainably altering his methods.

Methodology:

Successful Schools:

The basic foundation amount was determined by looking at the weighted average per pupil basic spending of selected school districts. After screening all 500 Ohio school districts and eliminating school districts that failed to meet specified criteria, 102 schools passed the selection process. The basic foundation amount was then adjusted by the additional factors listed below.

Selection Process:

Removal of districts that were among the highest or lowest 5 percent of all districts in terms of per pupil property wealth or median income per return.
Selection of schools using output criteria only: passage rates on proficiency tests, drop-out rates, and attendance rates.
Elimination of schools that spent at unusually low or high levels in administration, operations, and pupil support.

Additional Factors: The study includes considerations of: special education costs, costs associated with at-risk pupils, cost of living indexed by county, and transportation. The highest cost pressure county, for all sources other than transportation was 48.8 percent higher than the lowest cost pressure county. The study found that vocational education spending and spending on gifted pupil programs were not statistically significant and were therefore excluded.
Public Input: None.
Prepared for: The School Funding Task Force (The Task Force was formed after DeRolph I, and included the Governor, Speaker of the House, and the President of the Senate, minority leaders of the House and Senate, and was chaired by then State Budget Director R. Gregory Browning. The Task Force also had a staff which included representatives of the Department of Education, The Office of Budget and Management, and the Legislative Budget Office).
Prepared by: Augenblick & Myers, under a contract with The Ohio Department of Education.