Home

















Recent Developments | Useful Resources | State-by-State Map | Litigation Calendar | Court Decisions | Legal Documents | Litigation News  


South Dakota

In 1994, after the trial of an "equity" case, "Bezdicheck v. State," CIV 91-209, brought by school districts against the state, a South Dakota Circuit Court declared the state’s education finance system constitutional, despite acknowledged funding disparities. The court held that the state constitution requires school districts to provide an "adequate education" but does not require equal per-pupil spending, as plaintiffs had argued. Plaintiffs did not appeal.

Recent Events

On June 22, 2006, a coalition of 59 South Dakota school districts, and students and parents in those districts, filed a lawsuit against the state, claiming that the state's education finance system fails to provide sufficient resources for the state’s students to obtain “an education that will equip them to function in society as responsible citizens who can find productive employment,” as required by the South Dakota Constitution.

Plaintiffs in South Dakota Coalition of Schools v. State argue that a “free, adequate and quality education” is a fundamental right under the state constitution. Plaintiffs also contend that the present education finance system bears “no relationship to the actual costs of providing an adequate education” or to the state’s own “academic achievement and performance standards” and that it must do so in order to be constitutionally sound. A cost study commissioned by the coalition reported that the state’s schools are under-funded by $133 to $400 million.

In May 2007, the state attorney general, requested an audit of the coalition districts. He argued that school districts did not have standing to sue the State over the constitutionality of school funding, and that school district funds could not be used to support such litigation. Scott Abdallah, plaintiffs’ attorney, wrote to the state’s auditor general, arguing that the A.G. had requested an audit “of an alleged violation of a law that does not exist, involving contributions that are expressly authorized by statute.”

Trial has been scheduled for summer 2008.

Last updated: March, 2008