Home

















Costing-Out Home | Overview | A Primer | State Fact Sheets | Policy Brief  


Washington Fact Sheet

Related News

Study Title: "What Will it Take? Defining a Quality Education in Washington and a New Vision of Adequacy for School Funding"
   
Date Completed: March 2003
   
Calculated Base Costs: Elementary prototype: Current Spending Level (CSL) per pupil (2000-2001 school year): $6,113; Washington Quality Education Model (WQEM) per pupil: $8,393
  Middle-school prototype: CSL per pupil: $5,615; WQEM per pupil: $7,830
  High-school prototype: CSL per pupil: $5,915; WQEM per pupil: $7,753
   
Major Recommendations: Raise total expenditures for schools from $5.6 billion to $7.3 billion annually.
  Create a commission to manage the WQEM (or have an existing coalition do it). Responsibilities would include: reaching out to educators and legislators; maintaining and updating the QEM prototype schools; establishing performance goals; developing a way to measure whether these goals have been met; and adapting the model to rural and high-poverty schools.
  Create a blue-ribbon task force to examine how the money for the QEM should be raised and how it should be distributed.
   
Special Features of the Study: The study sought to produce a quality education financial model, not an entire state school-finance system.
  Assumption that state will pay costs for all special education students for whom costs are 4X the cost of a regular student or higher.
  The study detailed implementation strategies.
   
Implementation: Not yet implemented
   
Methodology: Professional Judgement
  The WQEM presents three prototype schools with curriculum programs intended to meet both state and federal "No Child Left Behind Act" standards. These prototype schools were formulated using current expenditures, research on best education practices, and the knowledge of experts from Washington districts and schools. Additionally, working groups were asked to assign ratings of importance to methods created to assess the performance of schools and their progress towards the "vision" of an adequate education for all students in Washington. They were asked to formulate recommendations and then later review the results.
 

WQEM Elementary Prototype: 498 students; increase teacher salaries; reduce class size; create full-day kindergarten; increase staff for arts, physical education, and foreign language instruction; increase staff for English Language Learners (ELL), special education, and the 20% lowest performing students (to close achievement gaps); increase administrative staff; increase budget for materials, technology, and extracurricular activities; increase professional development opportunities; increase community outreach.

WQEM Middle School Prototype: 848 students; increase staff for academic and elective programs, attendance, family and community outreach, and administrative duties; increase funding for materials; increase professional development opportunities; increase staff for ELL, special education students, and students needing help to reach standards; increase curriculum and assessment development; increase community outreach.

WQEM High School Prototype: 1,421 students; increase staff for core subjects, alternative programs, additional programs for potential dropouts, co-curricular activities, counseling, attendance, and departmental support; increase staff for ELL, special education students, and students needing help to reach standards; increase funding for materials, classroom equipment, and computers; increase opportunities for professional development; increase funding for extracurricular and community outreach programs.

  The methodology utilized in the Washington study was first developed in the state of Oregon, the first study to create a QEM.
   
Additional Factors:   The study considered federal NCLB requirements, state standards and statutes, and implementation strategies. The study did not consider revenue generation and distribution, facilities, preschool, high-quality teacher and administrator preparation programs (university-level), the added cost of "diversity or special situations" across the state, or additional poverty factors.
   
Public Input: None
   
Prepared for: The Rainier Institute (Dr. David Conley and William Freund)
   
Prepared by: Academic, Achievement and Accountability Commission, Association of Washington School Principals, Latino/a Educational Achievement Project, Office of Financial Management, Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, Parent Teacher Association, Public School Employees, University of Washington College of Education, Washington Association for Colleges of Teacher Education, Washington Association of School Administrators, Washington Education Association, Washington State School Directors Association, Washington School Personnel Association